28ten said:
How does it compare with the MOK kit?
Hi
I didn't set them up one against the other yesterday - it was a working day rather that a play day - so I can't as yet compare.
What I will say is that the San Cheng 8F is a corking model, and you would have to be a very good builder to build something better. The engine body and tender are very good, it is the engine chassis that lets it down. Most of you will know I am modestly

anally retentive about chassis, so any criticism I have is bearing this in mind.
The valve gear is let down by the return crank (awful), lack of forked joints and general lack of bulk. There is something wrong at the front end, which I put down to the skeletal front bogie (devoid of detail and far too flimsy) and the front bogie wheel. There is a gaping hole in the sideframes where the ash pan should be seen through the frames, the brake hangers and shoes are insubstantial as are the spreaders. The exhaust steam and live steam injectors and associated piping are missing, and I don't like the pick-ups (which is more a personal choice). The cylinder detail is pretty good, but could be bettered.
That's being ruthlessly critical, and I am not considering that this is designed for the 'mass' market as a robust and trouble-free RTR, which role it fulfils admirably.
If I could pick up a sound body and tender with a defunct engine chassis, I would do so in a trice and be quite happy to replace the engine chassis to achieve a very good model indeed. I think then it would be quite hard to distinguish the MOK and San Cheng models (which show how good a fist San Cheng made of it in the first place).
Richard
PS: anyone know of a San Cheng 8F going cheap?

Doesn't need to be working.