Not quite the behaviour I was trying to describe... when power was applied from a stand a Wizzo would kind of sit down on the rear bogie, rock onto the front one and then take off... like a rocket,
It's called weight transfer and quite a few locos do it, especially the more compact short wheel base variants, it's a major problem these days with heavier trains, many locos now use electronics to decrease the power to the rear motor (not applicable to hydraulics of course) to stop it digging in and tilting the bogie. Of course this works best with AC motors and their individual inverter drives, DC motors still tend to all be fed from one bus (armature) making individual motor control quite complex, but it can be done through field control. Some designs use hydraulic rams to push the nose of the bogie down, others use complex outside torque bars and linkage to achieve the same (SAR 8E class).
It's now such a big problem in the US as they have reached the limit of adhesion with Co-Co's even with individual motor control and super creep, the lastest technological leap to eliminate weight transfer is lifting wheels and thus increasing the loco weight for the traction wheels and increasing the effective length of the wheel base. GE has developed with BNSF the ES44C4 with is visually a Co-Co but only 4 powered axles, in effect a A1A-A1A (aka class 31), there's more than enough power in the 4 motors to meet adhesion levels. In super traction mode the inner axle is lifted via linkages (externally visible) to increase the weight on the outer powered ones. It must work as BNSF have an order for over 1000 of these!
Closer to home the class 86, 87 & 90 with flexicoil springs visibly move under acceleration, obviously having braked into a station the bogies are pushed back and the springs flex rearward, on starting the bogies move forward, past mid point and toward full forward, if the bearings and traction links are worn it could be 6" or more.
/End] OT technology diversion